All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:25:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201212121225.11667.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C8543F.8000508@st.com>

Dear Vipin Kumar,

> >> +		ulong start = get_timer(0);
> >> +
> >> +		do {
> >> +			ret = usb_get_port_status(dev, i + 1, portsts);
> >> +			if (ret<  0) {
> >> +				USB_HUB_PRINTF("get_port_status failed\n");
> >> +				break;
> >> +			}
> >> +
> >> +			portstatus = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortStatus);
> >> +			portchange = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortChange);
> >> +
> >> +			if ((portchange&  USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION) ==
> >> +				(portstatus&  USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION))
> > 
> > I don't know if there is any corner case when the above check
> > will always fail and so it will always wait a maximal delay time.
> > Are those registers that identical, or can there be differences?
> > 
> >> +				break;
> >> +
> >> +			mdelay(100);
> >> +		} while (get_timer(start)<  CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10);
> > 
> > Is there any justification for the CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10?
> > I would be much more fine with this patch if there were any
> > (even just test based * 2) reason for that number.
> 
> Not really. Just a practical test.
> Marek, can I have comments from you as well
> 

Sorry, I'm really busy these days. I went through it and I see Igor still has 
some comment. Just fix that one and I'm good.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-12 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07  8:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration Vipin Kumar
2012-12-07 10:03 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-07 10:18   ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-07 10:32     ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12  9:54   ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12 11:25     ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-12-13  6:11       ` Vipin Kumar
2012-12-12 11:40     ` Igor Grinberg
2012-12-12 12:00       ` Vipin Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201212121225.11667.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.