From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:12:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:60742 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6823126Ab2LLPMFsK0lW (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:12:05 +0100 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBCFC5AP006931; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:12:05 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBCFC4l6006930; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:12:04 +0100 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:12:04 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen , "Steven J. Hill" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] OF: MIPS: sead3: Implement OF support. Message-ID: <20121212151204.GD11791@linux-mips.org> References: <1354857297-28863-1-git-send-email-sjhill@mips.com> <50C894D4.4090008@openwrt.org> <50C89A6C.705@metafoo.de> <20121212145545.GC11791@linux-mips.org> <50C89C67.7040908@openwrt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50C89C67.7040908@openwrt.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-archive-position: 35267 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:01:59PM +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote: > The convention for vendor prefixes is to use the stock exchange > prefix, giving us "mips". The same problem exist for ARM Ltd. vs > architecture and they use "arm" as a prefix unconditionaly. ARM is traded at LSE as ARM but on Nasdaq as ARMH. Pick one ;) Conventions are made to be violated for good reasons ... Ralf