All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dwysocha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: remove unneeded permission check from path_init
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:40:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121212184049.GO4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355234176-767-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:56:16AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> When path_init is called with a valid dfd, that code checks permissions
> on the open directory fd and returns an error if the check fails. This
> permission check is redundant, however.
> 
> Both callers of path_init immediately call link_path_walk afterward. The
> first thing that link_path_walk does is to check for exec permissions
> at the starting point of the path walk.
> 
> In most cases, these checks are very quick, but when the dfd is for a
> file on a NFS mount with the actimeo=0, each permission check goes
> out onto the wire. The result is 2 identical ACCESS calls.
> 
> Given that these codepaths are fairly "hot", I think it makes sense to
> eliminate the permission check in path_init and simply assume that the
> caller will eventually check the permissions before proceeding.

Applied, with one modification to commit message - the second paragraph
replaced with

Both callers of path_init immediately call link_path_walk afterward. The
first thing that link_path_walk does for pathnames that do not consist
only of slashes is to check for exec permissions at the starting point of
the path walk.  And this check in path_init() is on the path taken only
when *name != '/' && *name != '\0'.

      reply	other threads:[~2012-12-12 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-11 13:56 [PATCH] vfs: remove unneeded permission check from path_init Jeff Layton
2012-12-12 18:40 ` Al Viro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121212184049.GO4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=dwysocha@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.