From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TitCK-0008Jk-RY for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:46:34 +0100 Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h11so381318eaa.6 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:31:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-gm-message-state; bh=r7E/3t/DkM4RFfGhlWoNDufy71OqSCN2LP58vgAQfCA=; b=ATXVcuQCmBihq5PwPzkTT5Ey5YeGnR+vL88EOWabk08dyHbrGs1L90dqdNc2kD44dZ 32MBgppv18k9LObUSBIngfy3x1iXOjc9Qk6S/Hkxnl9qKYoFUgpfW8nnLMf5IhSzWd/w 5wX0Ywgtff72Q8/Vt0AMYZy8BDHmQrhhlOcxfpRF3aVPQM1CliIXHidHweF8yvk6wUKn jY4N2Vh+3KL6F5DiCxnvD/6Zs+8vhMgnWNizwYSeTcfC/OSEnR51e+o8FqIbcnxEPg/o 33CzuLyMBrSuziiZw8+QtFhfw1iNhQhKJ5bZn3yYg1qBMJqzxHE15fEZV1WLeD2UvtKF vmtw== Received: by 10.14.0.133 with SMTP id 5mr5719050eeb.29.1355344318955; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:31:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com ([46.196.117.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k4sm51726295eep.15.2012.12.12.12.31.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:31:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:31:51 +0200 From: Eren =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=FCrkay?= To: "Robert P. J. Day" Message-ID: <20121212203151.GC743@gmail.com> References: <20121212184156.GA743@gmail.com> <20121212195335.GB743@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkwjUXdY1pUBAdcqKNt90ukZMf2bxNqv47wrPTo2wYcvINM5JDTm8porAYp6cFUQu0JVaic Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitbake.vim: detect *.bbappend files in ftdetect automatically X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:46:34 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 3034 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GUPx2O/K0ibUojHx" Content-Disposition: inline --GUPx2O/K0ibUojHx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 03:02:31PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > sorry, i didn't mean to pick on you. :-) i would avoid that kind of > extreme optimization for a couple reasons. No problem :) > also, it's sort of just a fluke that you can do that kind of > optimization. the instant you add another suffix that starts with > something other than a "b", it messes things up and you lose the > advantage. Right, at first glance such a little code is not understood instantly. foo.{bbclass,bbappend,bb} is more natural for suffixes. > anyway, i will leave this in the hands of folks higher up the food > chain. I'm sending V2 of the patch.=20 --=20 . 73! DE TA1AET http://linkedin.com/in/erenturkay --GUPx2O/K0ibUojHx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQyOm3AAoJEOM7bMm6HhcTebEQAKilhNqS/aShGaObsdT3/h9b 8qdn5u64wny7mBPf3/aXihCBG5NNs170VZ6bvgEhn0JTfycMaFGnmHilPf+d+B07 mL6y7EJFEuTKqdif7JiaBwQqQDFagbqEh3rYdzK1K9ovs+gT7DlDqYZA4hmNg+M5 5tcXOqav0mXK1CHc4WJmWaW8ao4TkoALjN6pnqSPCrYtvyUdMjyqVjmhjn+y2TRI IB3UoVqTSY1kDeIo1BxGmdUntp4/6fLqeu1gSdUYoWOmX+hmYi0nUgdpAPI4ASDq ZmXJ8Fml9vLlneRhOOP79dgA2sHDfLBRIR4ZC/OJv4lLX4swXTnMqMt9JV9gwVtJ v8yer6vTbEinO+KgA3PjlCtk0jJ9z7BVIwFTP2WqfMJgWLgW0kvqiD1sGuIvOYFn 5IrFAndLiIrmGGyFzTpUr6SpP3jGTnz2H2UDPZxbaL/b9NOISvgwlLUNsbZaFY2Q LfbHOgVd1hn0ZFbxf3SQWzRO9uny+DPimQXTngBZjp0NQbzO4oS96y8aPNmUQmSL Z/R1J4J15XqQP9tFao4IigL51qv+8iBW5L5U5yagkVbGi0YBWUvwTis90utnw0E8 RrX4jMpQTRH71wxwZhL5Y6nFMAa/XBrKNJ3wSLKpTkq/1qEKYGkJbBrQyDmn/IVC OjwHUhc15nSq6p+QpL+v =BDAT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GUPx2O/K0ibUojHx--