From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754854Ab2LMLX1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:23:27 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50583 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753631Ab2LMLX0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:23:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:23:23 +0000 From: Mel Gorman To: anish kumar Cc: Han Pingtian , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: A typo about kernelcore= ? Message-ID: <20121213112323.GB9887@suse.de> References: <20121207070241.GA2464@localhost.localdomain> <1354949336.22178.4.camel@anish-Inspiron-N5050> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1354949336.22178.4.camel@anish-Inspiron-N5050> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:48:56PM -0800, anish kumar wrote: > On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 15:02 +0800, Han Pingtian wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I'm wondering this is a typo in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > about "kernelcore=": > > > > .... In the event, a node is too small to have both > > kernelcore and Movable pages, kernelcore pages will > > take priority and other nodes will have a larger number > > of kernelcore pages. > > > > I think it should be > > > > .... In the event, a node is too small to have both > > kernelcore and Movable pages, kernelcore pages will > > take priority and other nodes will have a larger number > > of *Movable* pages. > > > > Is it right? Thanks in advance! > adding the maintainer. yeah, larger number of movable pages -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs