From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: neilb@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 1/2]block: discard granularity might not be power of 2
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:15:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121214031536.GA30345@kernel.org> (raw)
In MD raid case, discard granularity might not be power of 2, for example, a
4-disk raid5 has 3*chunk_size discard granularity. Correct the calculation for
such cases.
Reported-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
---
block/blk-lib.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
block/blk-settings.c | 6 +++---
include/linux/blkdev.h | 7 ++++---
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux/block/blk-lib.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/block/blk-lib.c 2012-10-15 10:01:52.763544641 +0800
+++ linux/block/blk-lib.c 2012-12-14 08:56:24.539932760 +0800
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_de
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
int type = REQ_WRITE | REQ_DISCARD;
- unsigned int max_discard_sectors;
- unsigned int granularity, alignment, mask;
+ sector_t max_discard_sectors;
+ sector_t granularity, alignment;
struct bio_batch bb;
struct bio *bio;
int ret = 0;
@@ -57,15 +57,16 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_de
/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same. */
granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
- mask = granularity - 1;
- alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) & mask;
+ alignment = bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9;
+ alignment = sector_div(alignment, granularity);
/*
* Ensure that max_discard_sectors is of the proper
* granularity, so that requests stay aligned after a split.
*/
max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9);
- max_discard_sectors = round_down(max_discard_sectors, granularity);
+ sector_div(max_discard_sectors, granularity);
+ max_discard_sectors *= granularity;
if (unlikely(!max_discard_sectors)) {
/* Avoid infinite loop below. Being cautious never hurts. */
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -83,7 +84,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_de
while (nr_sects) {
unsigned int req_sects;
- sector_t end_sect;
+ sector_t end_sect, tmp;
bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 1);
if (!bio) {
@@ -98,10 +99,12 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_de
* misaligned, stop the discard at the previous aligned sector.
*/
end_sect = sector + req_sects;
- if (req_sects < nr_sects && (end_sect & mask) != alignment) {
- end_sect =
- round_down(end_sect - alignment, granularity)
- + alignment;
+ tmp = end_sect;
+ if (req_sects < nr_sects &&
+ sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
+ end_sect = end_sect - alignment;
+ sector_div(end_sect, granularity);
+ end_sect = end_sect * granularity + alignment;
req_sects = end_sect - sector;
}
Index: linux/block/blk-settings.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/block/blk-settings.c 2012-10-15 10:01:52.763544641 +0800
+++ linux/block/blk-settings.c 2012-12-14 09:53:18.493013557 +0800
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits
bottom = b->discard_granularity + alignment;
/* Verify that top and bottom intervals line up */
- if (max(top, bottom) & (min(top, bottom) - 1))
+ if ((max(top, bottom) % min(top, bottom)) != 0)
t->discard_misaligned = 1;
}
@@ -619,8 +619,8 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits
b->max_discard_sectors);
t->discard_granularity = max(t->discard_granularity,
b->discard_granularity);
- t->discard_alignment = lcm(t->discard_alignment, alignment) &
- (t->discard_granularity - 1);
+ t->discard_alignment = lcm(t->discard_alignment, alignment) %
+ t->discard_granularity;
}
return ret;
Index: linux/include/linux/blkdev.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/blkdev.h 2012-10-15 10:01:52.999541673 +0800
+++ linux/include/linux/blkdev.h 2012-12-13 14:26:25.469877308 +0800
@@ -1180,13 +1180,14 @@ static inline int queue_discard_alignmen
static inline int queue_limit_discard_alignment(struct queue_limits *lim, sector_t sector)
{
- unsigned int alignment = (sector << 9) & (lim->discard_granularity - 1);
+ sector_t alignment = sector << 9;
+ alignment = sector_div(alignment, lim->discard_granularity);
if (!lim->max_discard_sectors)
return 0;
- return (lim->discard_granularity + lim->discard_alignment - alignment)
- & (lim->discard_granularity - 1);
+ alignment = lim->discard_granularity + lim->discard_alignment - alignment;
+ return sector_div(alignment, lim->discard_granularity);
}
static inline int bdev_discard_alignment(struct block_device *bdev)
next reply other threads:[~2012-12-14 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-14 3:15 Shaohua Li [this message]
2012-12-14 19:42 ` [patch 1/2]block: discard granularity might not be power of 2 Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121214031536.GA30345@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.