From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (18.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net [178.33.45.10]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF04E01404 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 06:13:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail609.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 52F3D10581B4 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:22:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2012 16:13:46 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO eb-e6520) (eric%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2012 16:13:43 +0200 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:13:14 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Andrei Gherzan X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.5 (mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) Message-ID: <20121214151314.001f1ec8@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: References: <1355486234-7035-1-git-send-email-andrei.gherzan@windriver.com> <20121214145331.54c07822@eb-e6520> <20121214150150.1aa8eaf5@eb-e6520> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 3753468815458217362 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehjedrtdelucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthhqredtredtud X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehjedrtdelucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthhqredtredtud Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Andrei Gherzan Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:13:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:04:13 +0200, Andrei Gherzan a =E9crit : > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Eric B=E9nard wrote: >=20 > > Le Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:56:11 +0200, > > Andrei Gherzan a =E9crit : > > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Eric B=E9nard wrot= e: > > > > > > > Hi Andrei, > > > > > > > > Le Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:57:12 +0200, > > > > Andrei Gherzan a =E9crit : > > > > > > > > > It's not right to have a recipe named as uboot even if it uses a = repo > > > > > specific to freescale boards. This would lead to issues while usi= ng > > other > > > > > bsp layers in conjunction to meta-fsl-arm where different u-boot > > versions > > > > > but same uboot name are used. > > > > > > > > > why don't you simply add a COMPATIBLE_MACHINE in the u-boot recipe ? > > > > > > > > > > It's not about our layer. It's about making this work with layers whi= ch > > > don't have that. > > > > > that don't have what ? > > >=20 > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE in their recipes. >=20 then these BSP need to be fixed, else you may also start to rename other recipes in meta-fsl-arm only because other BSP are faulty. Eric