From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (6.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net [178.32.119.138]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA0CE01404 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 06:26:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail609.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7893F1034196 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:34:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2012 16:26:49 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO eb-e6520) (eric%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2012 16:26:48 +0200 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:26:19 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Andrei Gherzan X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.5 (mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) Message-ID: <20121214152619.79098454@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: References: <1355486234-7035-1-git-send-email-andrei.gherzan@windriver.com> <20121214145331.54c07822@eb-e6520> <20121214150150.1aa8eaf5@eb-e6520> <20121214151314.001f1ec8@eb-e6520> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 3974145197552217490 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehjedrtdelucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthhqfedtredtud X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehjedrtdelucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthhqfedtredtud Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:26:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:15:33 +0200, Andrei Gherzan a =E9crit : > What if uboot will have a git version in oe-core in the future? Or a > greater one. How would you fix that? I still think this is a good longterm > solution. >=20 well, in that case the BSP recipe will be used as the layer has a higher priority. And to not have this kind of issue, you can simpy add the following lines to your BSP's u-boot recipe : DEFAULT_PREFERENCE =3D "-1" DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_machine =3D "1" or simply change to a u-boot_git.bbappend to just append your machine specific changes to oe-core's default recipe. or add something like this in your BSP conf file : PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?=3D "linux-yocto" PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto =3D "3.4%" Check 1.2.9 in BSP Guide for examples on how this can be done (example for linux-yocto but the use case is the same here). Eric