From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Baltieri Subject: Re: tx/rx LED trigger support Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:31:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20121214163122.GA20128@balto.lan> References: <50CB1618.3040805@pengutronix.de> <20121214121649.GA13906@vandijck-laurijssen.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:42447 "EHLO mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755599Ab2LNQbi (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:31:38 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hj13so634728wib.1 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:31:37 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121214121649.GA13906@vandijck-laurijssen.be> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Marc Kleine-Budde , "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" Cc: Kurt Van Dijck On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:16:49PM +0100, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > > I still have pending comments on my last sent patches. > I must find time to rework some things. > > There was a patch to determine if _a_ netdevice is > actually a can_dev based device (i.e. not slcan or vcan), > so one can use can_priv. > That patch is operational and may be usefull for other users > as well. Actually if I'm not missing anything we were at a point where we just missed the safe led-rename function, which I has been accepted in the meantime and is in LED maintainer's -next branch with a pending pull request. I was planning to wait for the merge of that patch, rebase all patches, retest and send the whole series to the list again, is that ok for you? Thanks, Fabio -- Fabio Baltieri