From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (4.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net [178.33.111.247]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976DFE00294 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail609.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B3701004082 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:06:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2012 19:58:53 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO eb-e6520) (eric%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2012 19:58:51 +0200 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:58:22 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Daiane Angolini X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.5 (mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) Message-ID: <20121214185822.4bea3ad0@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: <50CB58BF.5030309@freescale.com> References: <1355486234-7035-1-git-send-email-andrei.gherzan@windriver.com> <20121214145331.54c07822@eb-e6520> <20121214150150.1aa8eaf5@eb-e6520> <20121214151314.001f1ec8@eb-e6520> <20121214152619.79098454@eb-e6520> <20121214163024.7427cf1d@eb-e6520> <50CB58BF.5030309@freescale.com> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 7555632801935306041 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehjedruddtucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthhqredtredtud X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehjedruddtucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthhqredtredtud Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:58:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:50:07 -0200, Daiane Angolini a =E9crit : > In the other hand, we may rename our u-boot recipe to=20 > u-boot-somethingelse. This way, we have to face less support, and no=20 > need to teach anyone how to fix their layer. >=20 > How I'm lazy, I would choose the renaming option. >=20 > If I'm wrong on any point, please let me know. I'm not sure I completely= =20 > understand the issue here, so I may be simplistic in my interpretation. >=20 how often have you seen a support request concerning a u-boot problem here ? BTW, you will have some issues if someone has a qt recipe or bbappend is its overlay so why don't you also rename qt to qt-fslc (espaciallyas you add a patch to it in meta-fsl-arm so it's no more mainline) ? Eric