All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] virtio: reset all qbuses too when writing to the status field
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:15:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121216211500.GB21521@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50CE2184.9020908@redhat.com>

On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 08:31:16PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/12/2012 18:04, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:54:23AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 12/12/2012 22:27, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >>>>> Maybe it's obvious to you that qdev_reset_all(x)
> >>>>> does a soft reset and what soft reset means
> >>>>> for each bus type
> >>>>
> >>>> We can define soft reset to be *independent* of the bus type.  As you
> >>>> said, you access it with a device register.
> >>>
> >>> I think qemu has one type of reset ATM which is the hard reset.
> >>
> >> A hard reset would kill BARs and configuration space too.
> >> qdev_reset_all doesn't.  Ergo, it is not a hard reset.
> >>
> >> But hey, I'm not wed to names.  Let's call it device-level reset and
> >> bus-level reset.  Whatever.
> > 
> > It's not a question of a name.
> > 
> > ATM qemu supports one kind of reset because it's a kind of reset all
> > hardware supports.  The moment we start inventing
> > our own one we need to document exactly what it means.
> 
> We have two, DeviceClass's and BusClass's reset members.
> 
> I'll make a patch to document them.
> 
> > You have a point about a problem.
> > 
> > My problem is with the solution, this solution depends on the exact
> > modeling for correctness and that I don't want to do since we seem to be
> > re-shuffling what inherits what so often.
> > 
> > For example I could not figure out how the reset function for virtio pci
> > (which clears pending msix vectors so is required) was called by this.
> 
> The same way a PCI bus reset clears pending MSIX vectors.
> 
> qdev_reset_all(pci_dev)
>    -> qdev_walk_children(pci_dev, qdev_reset_one, qbus_reset_one, NULL);
>    -> qdev_reset_one(pci_dev, NULL);
>    -> device_reset(pci_dev);
>    -> calls dc->reset member set for virtio-*-pci, i.e. virtio_pci_reset
> 
> > Another thing that bothers me is that during regular PCI bus reset
> > virtio does not invoke qdev_reset_all but with this reset, it does.
> > Inconsistent.
> 
> It does.
> 
> A PCI bus reset (or FLR) calls pci_device_reset which does this
> 
> void pci_device_reset(PCIDevice *dev)
> {
>     int r;
> 
>     qdev_reset_all(&dev->qdev);
>     ...
> }
> 
> This is exactly how a PCI bus reset clears pending MSIX vectors.
> 
> Paolo

Yes but I mean virtio-pci device is not a bus.
virtio could be a bus.
Our modeling seems incorrect and relying on it for correctness,
looks a bit wrong.

-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-16 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 14:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] virtio: reset all qbuses too when writing to the status field Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 14:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] virtio-pci: " Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 14:44   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-12 15:20     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 15:33       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-12 16:37         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 17:05           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-12 17:29             ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 21:32               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-13  7:56                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 14:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio-s390: " Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 15:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] virtio: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-12 16:38   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-12 17:18     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found]       ` <50C8BF83.4010307@redhat.com>
     [not found]         ` <20121212212720.GC23087@redhat.com>
2012-12-13  8:54           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-16 17:04             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-16 19:31               ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-16 21:15                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2012-12-17  9:24                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-17 10:40                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-17 15:14                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-17 15:24                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-17 15:37                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-17 16:01                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-17 16:14                           ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121216211500.GB21521@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.