All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [xen:stable/for-linus-3.8 11/13] arch/x86/xen/smp.c:257:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_store_boot_cpu_info'
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:49:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121218154940.GC13450@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50d00197.j0ofCx2fkiqUCGLe%fengguang.wu@intel.com>

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:39:35PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-linus-3.8
> head:   9d328a948f38ec240fc6d05db2c146e23ccd9b8b
> commit: 06d0b5d9edcecccab45588a472cd34af2608e665 [11/13] xen/smp: Use smp_store_boot_cpu_info() to store cpu info for BSP during boot time.
> config: make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
> 
> All error/warnings:
> 
> arch/x86/xen/smp.c: In function 'xen_smp_prepare_cpus':
> arch/x86/xen/smp.c:257:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_store_boot_cpu_info' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

This is OK - I was contemplating merging in the required patches (so merge a 3.8 merge)
in the branch but Linus is adamant about that sort of thing not being done. So will
punt on this - as when Linus merges this branch it won't have compile errors.

> 
> vim +/smp_store_boot_cpu_info +257 arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> 
> ed467e69 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2011-09-01  251  
> ed467e69 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2011-09-01  252  		xen_raw_printk(m);
> ed467e69 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2011-09-01  253  		panic(m);
> ed467e69 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2011-09-01  254  	}
> 2d9e1e2f Jeremy Fitzhardinge   2008-07-07  255  	xen_init_lock_cpu(0);
> 2d9e1e2f Jeremy Fitzhardinge   2008-07-07  256  
> 06d0b5d9 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2012-12-17 @257  	smp_store_boot_cpu_info();
> c7b75947 Jeremy Fitzhardinge   2008-07-08  258  	cpu_data(0).x86_max_cores = 1;
> 900cba88 Andrew Jones          2009-12-18  259  
> 900cba88 Andrew Jones          2009-12-18  260  	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel build testing backend         Open Source Technology Center
> Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu                              Intel Corporation

      reply	other threads:[~2012-12-18 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-18  5:39 [xen:stable/for-linus-3.8 11/13] arch/x86/xen/smp.c:257:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_store_boot_cpu_info' kbuild test robot
2012-12-18 15:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121218154940.GC13450@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.