From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: don't disable disconnected outputs
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:33:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121218203330.GX5737@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121218085633.3baa4836@jbarnes-desktop>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:56:33AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:37:54 +0100
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> > This piece of neat lore has been ported painstakingly and bug-for-bug
> > compatible from the old crtc helper code.
> >
> > Imo it's utter nonsense.
> >
> > If you disconnected a cable and before you reconnect it, userspace (or
> > the kernel) does an set_crtc call, this will result in that connector
> > getting disabled. Which will result in a nice black screen when
> > plugging in the cable again.
> >
> > There's absolutely no reason the kernel does such policy enforcements
> > - if userspace tries to set up a mode on something disconnected we
> > might fail loudly (since the dp link training fails), but silently
> > adjusting the output configuration behind userspace's back is a recipe
> > for disaster. Specifically I think that this could explain some of our
> > MI_WAIT hangs around suspend, where userspace issues a scanline wait
> > on a disable pipe. This mechanisims here could explain how that pipe
> > got disabled without userspace noticing.
> >
> > Note that this fixes a NULL deref at BIOS takeover when the firmware
> > sets up a disconnected output in a clone configuration with a
> > connected output on the 2nd pipe: When doing the full modeset we don't
> > have a mode for the 2nd pipe and OOPS. On the first pipe this doesn't
> > matter, since at boot-up the fbdev helpers will set up the choosen
> > configuration on that on first. Since this is now the umptenth bug
> > around handling this imo brain-dead semantics correctly, I think it's
> > time to kill it and see whether there's any userspace out there which
> > relies on this.
> >
> > It also nicely demonstrates that we have a tiny window where DP
> > hotplug can still kill the driver.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58396
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Tested-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 34832bc0..399f862 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -7632,10 +7632,6 @@ intel_modeset_stage_output_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("encoder changed, full mode switch\n");
> > config->mode_changed = true;
> > }
> > -
> > - /* Disable all disconnected encoders. */
> > - if (connector->base.status == connector_status_disconnected)
> > - connector->new_encoder = NULL;
> > }
> > /* connector->new_encoder is now updated for all connectors. */
> >
>
> I think this is safe now; iirc this logic comes from X, when we weren't
> sure about the initial config so we just shut everything off pretty
> aggressively. We clearly weren't thinking of atomic mode sets back
> then either...
>
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the review.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-18 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-18 8:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: don't disable disconnected outputs Daniel Vetter
2012-12-18 11:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2012-12-18 16:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jesse Barnes
2012-12-18 20:33 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-11 17:46 Daniel Vetter
2012-10-12 9:02 ` Chris Wilson
2012-10-12 9:13 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121218203330.GX5737@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.