From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] synclink fix ldisc buffer argument Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:09:07 -0800 Message-ID: <20121219040907.GA22719@kroah.com> References: <50B8DDAC.8070901@microgate.com> <50B90D0D.9040401@microgate.com> <20121202151332.3b6a6504@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20121202181057.097012c6@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <989CB961-79F8-479B-B16C-41358A60AC94@microgate.com> <50BC0C84.4060802@asianux.com> <50BCCD4C.8050209@microgate.com> <50BEAA0E.9000603@asianux.com> <50D12521.8010808@asianux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50D12521.8010808@asianux.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chen Gang Cc: Paul Fulghum , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:23:29AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > Hello Paul Fulghum: > > it seems you are very busy, > and can not get your reply for "checking length in function rx_get_buf". You should always send patches, long emails like this about "potential" issues are hard to handle, patches are best. greg k-h