From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915: Make next_seqno debugs
 entry to use i915_gem_set_seqno
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:33:07 +0100
Message-ID: <20121219103307.GC5737@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1355908389-19097-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
	<1355908389-19097-5-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
	<f5ae8a$7uhkiu@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB16E5D12
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 02:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d41so932284eek.28
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 02:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f5ae8a$7uhkiu@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:57:58AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:13:09 +0200, Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > This debugs entry can be used to set arbitrary value to next_seqno.
> > Use i915_gem_set_seqno instead of poking next_seqno.
> > 
> > v2: nasty details of next_seqno and last_seqno handling
> > moved inside i915_gem_set_seqno as suggested by Chris Wilson.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
> 
> Series looks good,
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

And queued for -next, thanks.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch