From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio: don't poll masked vectors with irqfd
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:29:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121219112946.GC7742@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D18082.50509@redhat.com>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:53:22PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 08:39 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > At the moment when vector is masked virtio will poll it
> > in userspace, even if it is handled by irqfd.
> > This is done in order to update pending bits, but
> > it's not really required until someone reads the pending bits.
> > On the other hand this read results in extra io thread wakeups.
> >
> > As we only implement the pending bits as a compatibility
> > feature (read - real drivers don't use it), we can defer
> > the irqfd poll until the read actually happens.
> >
> > This does not seem to affect vhost-net speed
> > in simple benchmarks but could help block: both
> > vhost-blk and dataplane when using irqfd,
> > and I also think this is cleaner than enabling/disabling
> > notifiers all the time.
> >
> > This will also be the basis for future optimizations.
> >
> > Michael S. Tsirkin (3):
> > msi: add API to get notified about pending bit poll
> > msix: expose access to masked/pending state
> > virtio-pci: don't poll masked vectors
> >
> > hw/pci/msix.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> > hw/pci/msix.h | 6 +++++-
> > hw/pci/pci.h | 4 ++++
> > hw/vfio_pci.c | 2 +-
> > hw/virtio-pci.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 5 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> The performance boost is significant here. It is close to the
> result of dropping msix_fire_vector_notifier() hack.
Okay great. I have one other last optimization up my sleeve,
that should hopefully make it as fast as with the hack.
> --
> Asias
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-19 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-18 12:39 [PATCH 0/3] virtio: don't poll masked vectors with irqfd Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 12:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] virtio-pci: don't poll masked vectors Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-19 8:59 ` Asias He
2012-12-19 11:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-19 12:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-18 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] msix: expose access to masked/pending state Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] msi: add API to get notified about pending bit poll Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 12:41 ` [PATCH 0/3] virtio: don't poll masked vectors with irqfd Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-19 8:53 ` Asias He
2012-12-19 11:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121219112946.GC7742@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=asias@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.