From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55673) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlP66-0000bC-1I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:14:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlP60-0008Ai-TD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:14:29 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlP60-0008AY-Kx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:14:24 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:12:22 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20121219191222.GA29543@amt.cnet> References: <20121219154615.GA17584@redhat.com> <50D1E4A8.6060503@suse.de> <20121219163339.GA18201@amt.cnet> <50D20FE6.1030400@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50D20FE6.1030400@suse.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Take over kvm maintenance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Cc: Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori , Gleb Natapov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:05:10PM +0100, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Am 19.12.2012 17:33, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:00:40PM +0100, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > >> Am 19.12.2012 16:46, schrieb Gleb Natapov: > >>> > >>> Replace Avi with myself as kvm maintainer. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov > >> > >> That solves my mail bounce issue, too. > >> > >> If you put yourself as main KVM maintainer in Avi's place, note that= I > >> received zero feedback from Marcelo on my CPU series, which I theref= ore > >> just included in my pull request: > >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg02963.html > >=20 > > Because i have zero feedback to give, sorry. Did not review > > line-by-line, though, if that is what you're expecting. >=20 > I would've been okay with a simple "fine with me if it doesn't break > anything" or a "please defer until X". :) >=20 > I'm also surprised that there's been no KVM pull since v1.3 - are you > expecting Anthony to pick up KVM'ish patches himself now? Otherwise, > someone mentioned qemu-kvm.git were no longer updated - if that is true= , > where will you be staging pulls? qemu-kvm is obsolete - qemu-kvm users should switch to qemu 1.3. Staging: uq/master branch of http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-= kvm.git. Was fighting autotest failures which are now gone, there will be a pull request for the one patch in the branch asap.