From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 11.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.47.167] helo=mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TlTD3-00088X-P2 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:37:58 +0100 Received: from mail419.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id BC4C51010165 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:04:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2012 22:55:25 +0200 Received: from tal33-3-82-233-81-124.fbx.proxad.net (HELO eb-e6520) (eric%eukrea.com@82.233.81.124) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2012 22:55:24 +0200 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:55:23 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Otavio Salvador X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.5 (mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) Message-ID: <20121219215523.3f50cb4a@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: References: <50D1F76D.4070000@intel.com> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 3007278653225741692 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.233.81.124 (tal33-3-82-233-81-124.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehledrtdduucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhephihotghtohhprhhojhgvtghtrdhorhhgnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfgjfhhoofggtgfgsehtqhertdertddu X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehledrtdduucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhephihotghtohhprhhojhgvtghtrdhorhhgnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfgjfhhoofggtgfgsehtqhertdertddu Cc: Patches, oe-core layer Subject: Re: RFC: systemd integration X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:37:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:21:14 -0200, Otavio Salvador a =E9crit : > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Radu Moisan wrot= e: > > Hi guys, > > I have prepared a branch on poky-contrib (rmoisan/systemd) where I > > pulled systemd from meta-openembedded. The goal is to merge this into > > oe-core, so please take a look and give me your feedback on stuff that = needs > > work or things that I might have done wrong, so that I can prepare it f= or > > merge. > > At this point core-image-minimal and core-image-sato both boot fine= with > > systemd. There still are a few warnings but not critical(at runtime), at > > least in my opinion, you may want to take a look at those too. > > You can activate systemd by DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN =3D "systemd" >=20 > In this case, systemd is made *available* or used? Is it possible to > have sysvinit image and another systemd? >=20 there is a DISTRO_FEATURE in this patch which seems to give this choice : http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=3Drmoisan/= systemd&id=3D1dd15bf46003d0563e7f3441a6c73cbc1e90a79b DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN ?=3D "sysvinit" Eric