From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: new architectures, time_t __kernel_long_t
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:02:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121221050202.GP4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D3ECEB.1070401@zytor.com>
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 09:00:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/20/2012 08:57 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:18:01PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> The other types that are used as 64 bit on x32 are ino_t, nlink_t,
> >> size_t, ssize_t, ptrdiff_t, and off_t.
> >
> > *Kernel-side* we should not give a damn about the userland nlink_t, period.
> > Making it architecture-dependent had been a bad mistake that essentially
> > made nlink_t useless for the kernel. That mistake had been fixed; please,
> > do not bring it back. If some userland structure needs to include a field
> > encoding nlink_t values, please use an explicitly-sized type when refering
> > to it kernel-side.
> >
>
> We should never use userland types per se. We can use __kernel_*_t
> typedefs to make the kernel headers neater if it makes sense, but that
> is often not even necessary.
... as long as we do not have typedef __kernel_foo_t foo_t in linux/types.h.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-21 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-14 12:18 new architectures, time_t __kernel_long_t Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-14 12:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-11-14 16:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-15 9:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 13:59 ` H.J. Lu
2012-11-15 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 14:42 ` H.J. Lu
2012-11-15 15:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-21 4:57 ` Al Viro
2012-12-21 5:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-21 5:02 ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-12-21 5:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-21 5:19 ` Al Viro
2012-12-21 5:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121221050202.GP4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.