From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751376Ab2LUHVQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 02:21:16 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:50025 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751091Ab2LUHVE (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 02:21:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:20:56 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Vineet Gupta Cc: Rusty Russell , Jim Cromie , Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Ensure that kernel_init_freeable() is not inlined into non __init code Message-ID: <20121221072056.GS4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1356072944-23800-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1356072944-23800-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:25:44PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Commit d6b2123802d "make sure that we always have a return path from > kernel_execve()" reshuffled kernel_init()/init_post() to ensure that > kernel_execve() has a caller to return to. > > It removed __init annotation for kernel_init() and introduced/calls a > new routine kernel_init_freeable(). Latter however is inlined by any > reasonable compiler (ARC gcc 4.4 in this case), causing slight code > bloat. Interesting... I assumed that explicitly set different section would be enough, but I'd been wrong (or the original noinline would've been pointless, now that I think of it). Consider it ACKed; I can pick it through signal.git, and while it's not urgent I'd send it to Linus after -rc1, with Cc: stable. Or you can send it to him yourself with my usual Acked-by - up to you.