From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 7.mo3.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.57.200] helo=mo3.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TmNjL-0006Sa-Pi for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:59:11 +0100 Received: from mail402.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo3.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 86AE6FF90EA for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:18:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 22 Dec 2012 13:06:11 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO eb-e6520) (eric%eukrea.com@90.84.144.185) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 22 Dec 2012 13:06:10 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:05:51 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.3 (mo3.mail-out.ovh.net) Message-ID: <20121222120551.6916471a@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: References: <20121222100318.14a48e10@eb-e6520> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 10674094067623177545 X-Ovh-Remote: 90.84.144.185 () X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehledruddtucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecuhfhrohhmpefgrhhitgcuueornhgrrhguuceovghrihgtsegvuhhkrhgvrgdrtghomheqnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfgjfhhoofggtgfgsehtqhertdertddu X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehledruddtucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecuhfhrohhmpefgrhhitgcuueornhgrrhguuceovghrihgtsegvuhhkrhgvrgdrtghomheqnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfgjfhhoofggtgfgsehtqhertdertddu Cc: koen@dominion.thruhere.net Subject: Re: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide udev X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:59:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Koen, Le Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:10:09 +0100, Koen Kooi a =E9crit : > Please don't revert it, I really need those updates in denzil. Setting > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_udev is easy enough >=20 next time please tell this kind of "detail" in the commit log. IMHO we shouldn't ask stable branch users to change their build settings like this as they don't expect their build to break. In the present case, the patch is not only upgrading systemd : it's also changing systemd's recipe to build and provide udev. For example with meta-toolchain-qte even setting PREFERRED_PROVIDER_udev =3D "udev" does't fix the build as systemd is built and udev-182 is superceeded in deploy/ipk by udev-v189 and in the end meta-toolchain-qte fails as it is looking for udev-182 ... so only PREFERRED_PROVIDER_udev =3D "systemd" works but that means user will get a newer version of udev and not the one that had for months in their stable release). Do you have an idea to fix that so that the default stays udev 182 and users which need 189 can select it (and not the reverse) ? Thanks, Eric