From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 12.mo5.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.39.65] helo=mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmunt-0004uw-EM for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:18:01 +0100 Received: from mail188.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo5.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0097C1054112 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:24:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 23 Dec 2012 20:15:33 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO eb-e6520) (eric%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 23 Dec 2012 20:15:31 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:15:29 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Koen Kooi X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.5 (mo5.mail-out.ovh.net) Message-ID: <20121223191529.0ffdfe6a@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: <3DF8EBF7-61B4-4EBB-9C58-D1C63256FEF5@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <20121222100318.14a48e10@eb-e6520> <20121222120551.6916471a@eb-e6520> <20121223154736.3c151ef8@eb-e6520> <3DF8EBF7-61B4-4EBB-9C58-D1C63256FEF5@dominion.thruhere.net> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 5351120782948805909 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehledrudduucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthhqredtredtud X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehledrudduucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfhrhhomhepgfhrihgtuceurohnrghrugcuoegvrhhitgesvghukhhrvggrrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthhqredtredtud Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide udev X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:18:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Koen, Le Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:10:54 +0100, Koen Kooi a =E9crit : > Op 23 dec. 2012, om 15:47 heeft Eric B=E9nard het volge= nde geschreven: > > I need your help concerning denzil if you need to keep systemd 189 > > there : > >=20 > > with PREFERRED_PROVIDER_udev =3D "udev" > > systemd fails to package here >=20 > If you're going to use systemd then you'll need to use the matching udev = version. New systemd with old udev won't work. >=20 I'm not trying to use systemd but systemd gets built as a dependency of other packages and fails to build as you can see. If I understand well, the only solution to fix denzil is to revert the patch which upgrades systemd else systemd and udev are not in sync so builds are failing unless we force DEFAULT_PROVIDER_udev to systemd (as setting it to udev doesn't work). Eric