From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932342Ab2L1ThY (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:37:24 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:55410 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932258Ab2L1TS5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:18:57 -0500 Message-Id: <20121228190346.129347293@decadent.org.uk> User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1 Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:04:46 +0100 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: [ 076/173] nfsd: fix v4 reply caching In-Reply-To: <20121228190330.025298996@decadent.org.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 151.217.219.220 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: "J. Bruce Fields" commit 57d276d71aef7d8305ff002a070cb98deb2edced upstream. Very embarassing: 1091006c5eb15cba56785bd5b498a8d0b9546903 "nfsd: turn on reply cache for NFSv4" missed a line, effectively leaving the reply cache off in the v4 case. I thought I'd tested that, but I guess not. This time, wrote a pynfs test to confirm it works. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c index 2013aa00..30d3784 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ nfsd_dispatch(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __be32 *statp) } /* Store reply in cache. */ - nfsd_cache_update(rqstp, proc->pc_cachetype, statp + 1); + nfsd_cache_update(rqstp, rqstp->rq_cachetype, statp + 1); return 1; }