From: Reuben Martin <reuben.m.work@gmail.com>
To: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: Need for HW-clock independent timestamps
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 18:05:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2012819.dV4fgoeI0M@subterfuge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <793381ba-b59d-50e4-6d7b-cbe9bef91ba1@cgws.de>
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 2:29:24 PM CDT Axel Neumann wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your replies. But as you can see from my comments below
> this all does not look like a valid option for many embedded use cases.
Perhaps it might make sense to add functionality for WG to request a timest=
amp=20
from peers and to reply to TS requests so long as they are signed with a va=
lid=20
key.
Implementing the WG side of a TS exchange would probably be fairly trivial,=
=20
but I don=E2=80=99t know what is involved to take the received timestamp an=
d use that=20
to set the system clock. That part might present a whole can of worms that=
=20
Jason may not want to deal with.
=2DReuben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-12 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-11 22:07 WG: Need for HW-clock independent timestamps Axel Neumann
2018-05-11 22:45 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2018-05-12 0:05 ` Glen Bojsza
2018-05-12 19:29 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-12 19:41 ` Aaron Jones
2018-05-15 20:21 ` Devan Carpenter
2018-05-15 20:49 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2018-05-16 7:10 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-16 19:32 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-16 20:32 ` Steve Gilberd
2018-05-17 3:40 ` Paul
2018-05-17 5:03 ` Roman Mamedov
2018-05-17 5:53 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-17 7:07 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-17 8:28 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-16 20:35 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2018-05-12 22:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-05-12 23:05 ` Reuben Martin [this message]
2018-05-13 6:11 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-13 12:37 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-05-16 7:01 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-16 9:38 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-05-16 11:08 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-16 11:12 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-13 14:21 ` Wang Jian
2018-05-21 10:07 ` WG: " Axel Neumann
2018-05-21 11:22 ` Reto Brunner
2018-05-21 11:52 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-21 12:31 ` Axel Neumann
2018-05-21 12:35 ` Reto Brunner
2018-05-21 13:53 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-21 14:56 ` Bruno Wolff III
2018-05-21 15:34 ` Matthias Urlichs
2018-05-22 20:25 ` Ivan Labáth
2018-05-23 2:51 ` Matthias Urlichs
2019-02-04 14:56 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2019-02-23 4:00 ` Axel Neumann
2019-02-23 12:35 ` Ivan Labáth
[not found] <1324673763.992877.1526187430298.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2018-05-13 4:57 ` reiner otto
2018-05-13 12:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2012819.dV4fgoeI0M@subterfuge \
--to=reuben.m.work@gmail.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.