From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: uapi __NR_syscalls for microblaze Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:01:00 +0000 Message-ID: <201301031601.00594.arnd@arndb.de> References: <26599.1357221783@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:61333 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753261Ab3ACQBJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:01:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Michal Simek Cc: David Howells , LKML , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 03 January 2013, Michal Simek wrote: > 2013/1/3 David Howells : > > Michal Simek wrote: > > > >> just want to check with you if __NR_syscalls is necessary for user space. I > >> see that powerpc and arm have this macro in asm not in uapi like Microblaze. > >> If is not needed by user space, I should move it to asm/unistd.h > > > > It isn't as far as I know... I recommend putting your question on the > > linux-arch mailing list. > > I have add linux-arch to CC. Right, I'm pretty sure it's not needed, but it has traditionally been exported on a lot of platforms, so you can keep it in UAPI to be on the safe side. Arnd