From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix efifb initialisation when the only GOP device implements ConOut. Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:58:46 +0000 Message-ID: <20130107175846.GA385@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1357431222.9270.73.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <1357524250.9270.86.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <1357578923.8203.72.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <1357581080.2844.17.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1357581080.2844.17.camel-Fexsq3y4057IgHVZqg5X0TlWvGAXklZc@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Woodhouse Cc: Matt Fleming , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-efi List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 05:51:20PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > What is the bootloader *supposed* to do? Ignore this case? You can't run 32-bit kernels on 64-bit EFI, or vice-versa. You'll die on the first call to UEFI services. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org