From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsZdB-0005yE-Ir for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:54:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsZd6-0003jn-VF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:54:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsZd6-0003jV-OH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:54:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:58:02 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20130108135802.GA23732@redhat.com> References: <1355761490-10073-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1355761490-10073-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] qdev: make reset semantics more clear and consistent, reset qbuses under virtio devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > After discussion with mst on the topic of resetting virtio devices, > here is a series that hopefully clarifies the semantics of bus and > device resets. what started all this is a bug that affects virtio scsi. Since there's still a lot of argument about reworking reset, how about we fix the bug first, and attempt to rework reset on top? Will help stable etc as well. -- MST