All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] ARM i.MX51 babbage: Add display support
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:25:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301091125.32468.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357724786.2538.20.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de>

Dear Philipp Zabel,

> Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 10:26 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > Dear Philipp Zabel,
> > 
> > > Hi Marek,
> > > 
> > > Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 18:29 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > > > Dear Philipp Zabel,
> > > > 
> > > > > Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 18:09 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > > > > > Dear Fabio Estevam,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Fabio Estevam
> > > > > > > <festevam@gmail.com>
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi Sascha,
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Sascha Hauer
> > > > > > > > <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> The babbage board has a DVI-I output which allows to output
> > > > > > > >> analog and digital signals simultaneously. This patch adds
> > > > > > > >> support for it to the devicetree. The DDC signals are not
> > > > > > > >> wired up on the board, so DRM will fall back on default
> > > > > > > >> VESA modes.
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I am running linux-next 20130108, which has this patch
> > > > > > > > applied and I
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > get the following on my mx51babbage:
> > > > > > > Ok, good news. I see a nice penguin on my monitor now.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Discussed with Marek and he proposed a quick workaround:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipuv3-crtc.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipuv3-crtc.c
> > > > > > > @@ -343,6 +343,11 @@ static irqreturn_t ipu_irq_handler(int
> > > > > > > irq, void *dev_id) {
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >         struct ipu_crtc *ipu_crtc = dev_id;
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > +       if (!ipu_crtc->imx_crtc) {
> > > > > > > +               pr_err("Spurious IPU IRQ\n");
> > > > > > > +               return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > > > > +       }
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >         imx_drm_handle_vblank(ipu_crtc->imx_crtc);
> > > > > > >         
> > > > > > >         if (ipu_crtc->newfb) {
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It seems that this issue happened because bootloader leaves the
> > > > > > > IPU turned on.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > To elaborate more on this stuff:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 491         ipu_crtc->irq = ipu_idmac_channel_irq(ipu,
> > > > > > ipu_crtc->ipu_ch, 492                         IPU_IRQ_EOF);
> > > > > > 493         ret = devm_request_irq(ipu_crtc->dev, ipu_crtc->irq,
> > > > > > ipu_irq_handler, 0,
> > > > > > 494                         "imx_drm", ipu_crtc);
> > > > > > 495         if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > > 496                 dev_err(ipu_crtc->dev, "irq request failed
> > > > > > with %d.\n", ret);
> > > > > > 497                 goto err_out;
> > > > > > 498         }
> > > > > > 499
> > > > > > 500         disable_irq(ipu_crtc->irq);
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This code in drivers/staging/imx-drm/ipuv3-crtc.c is broken. If
> > > > > > the IPU is on, it produces an interrupt before the driver is
> > > > > > fully set up. I didn't produce a patch yet, I think I might
> > > > > > offload this to someone else. Volunteers?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reordering the ipu_get_resources and imx_drm_add_crtc calls should
> > > > > resolve this:
> > > > > 
> > > > > From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] staging: imx/drm: add crtc before registering
> > > > > interrupt
> > > > > 
> > > > >  handler
> > > > > 
> > > > > If the bootloader already enabled the display, the interrupt
> > > > > handler will be called as soon as it is registered. If the CRTC is
> > > > > not already added at this time, the call to imx_drm_handle_vblank
> > > > > will result in a NULL pointer dereference.
> > > > 
> > > > I ain't no IPU expert, but isn't adding the component before having
> > > > it fully inited even worse?
> > > 
> > > Good point, how about just moving the irq request out of
> > > ipu_get_resources into ipu_crtc_init, after adding the crtc:
> > > 
> > > From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] staging: imx/drm: request irq only after adding the
> > > crtc
> > > 
> > > If the bootloader already enabled the display, the interrupt handler
> > > will be called as soon as it is registered. If the CRTC is not already
> > > added at this time, the call to imx_drm_handle_vblank will result in
> > > a NULL pointer dereference.
> > 
> > Can we not just flush (and make sure it's disabled) the IRQ before
> > requesting it ? That'd be probably the most sane way
> 
> Probably, but that still would be no excuse for the interrupt handler to
> be registered before it can actually handle interrupts.

Yep, fully agreed.

Ok, can you check if the IRQ can be somehow flushed/disabled and then apply your 
last patch (the one that pulls the IRQ registration past imx_drm_add_crtc() )? 
That'd sound to me like a reasonable solution, what do you say? Apparently 
imx_drm_add_crtc() doesn't use the IRQ, so it should be cool too.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-09 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-12 15:23 [PATCH] i.MX IPU SoC support Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] ARM i.MX51: setup MIPI during startup Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 15:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM i.MX6: fix ldb_di_sel mux Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 15:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM i.MX5: switch IPU clk support to devicetree bindings Sascha Hauer
2012-12-11  5:57   ` Shawn Guo
2012-12-11  9:14     ` Sascha Hauer
2012-12-11 13:13       ` Shawn Guo
2012-11-12 15:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM i.MX53: Add IPU support Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 15:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM i.MX51: " Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 15:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM i.MX6: " Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 15:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM i.MX51 babbage: Add display support Sascha Hauer
2012-11-12 21:40   ` Martin Fuzzey
2012-11-12 21:53     ` Fabio Estevam
2013-01-08 16:41   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-01-08 17:04     ` Fabio Estevam
2013-01-08 17:09       ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-08 17:23         ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-08 17:29           ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-09  9:04             ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-09  9:26               ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-09  9:46                 ` Philipp Zabel
2013-01-09 10:25                   ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-01-08 17:31           ` Fabio Estevam
2012-11-13  2:52 ` [PATCH] i.MX IPU SoC support Shawn Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201301091125.32468.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.