From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 24/40] metag: DMA
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:08:59 +0000
Message-ID: <201301091609.00146.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <1351700061-7203-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <201211231647.27260.arnd@arndb.de> <50ED9525.9040806@imgtec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:63772 "EHLO
	moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757857Ab3AIQJH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:09:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <50ED9525.9040806@imgtec.com>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

On Wednesday 09 January 2013, James Hogan wrote:
> Would you like me to include this in the meta patchset or is it okay for
> you to take it through the asm-generic tree? (I can resend separately if
> you like)

I usually prefer patches to go through the tree of whoever needs them
for asm-generic.

	Arnd