Re: mesa-dri vs amd-gpu-x11-bin-mx51

["Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>]

Le Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:52:46 -0200,
Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> a écrit :

> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> wrote:
> > Le Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:54:13 +0200,
> > Andrei Gherzan <andrei@gherzan.ro> a écrit :
> >
> >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> wrote:
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > has anyone here already seen this messages ?
> >> >
> >> > Yes; I started checking it but I still do not have an absolute answer
> >> > to how to fix it.
> >> >
> >> > The problem is xserver-xorg (when it has glx enabled) it depends on
> >> > mesa-dri. Both mesa-dri and GPU package libraries (the mx5 and mx6
> >> > ones) provide same (theorical) functionality of mesa-dri, libraries
> >> > and (most) headers leading to those errors.
> >> >
> >> > I did check how Xorg is compiled in LTIB and it doesn't has glx
> >> > enabled so my idea is to disable glx in Xorg and try to go this route.
> >> > This would allow for a clean build at cost of making xserver-xorg
> >> > machine specific. Do you have any other idea?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Why do you need glx after all? We don't have opengl for imx53 right?
> >> And about the fix. Xorg with glx should  depend on virtual/libgl (or gl)
> >> not mesa-dri.
> >>
> > mesa-dri provides virtual/libgl which can explain why we find it here.
> 
> In fact mesa provides all them (GL ES2 and GL ES1 too).

yes, I was in Andrei's email context here.

meta-ti has the following lines in libgles-omap3.inc :
PROVIDES += "virtual/egl virtual/libgles1 virtual/libgles2"

RREPLACES_${PN} = "libegl libgles1 libgles2"
RREPLACES_${PN}-dev = "libegl-dev libgles1-dev libgles2-dev"
RREPLACES_${PN}-dbg = "libegl-dbg"

note they have the RREPLACES which are not in meta-fsl-arm's recipes.

Eric