From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+list@rabbit.us>
To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
Cc: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suboptimal raid6 linear read speed
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:58:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130116025857.GA31112@rabbit.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F614F7.20104@hardwarefreak.com>
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 08:48:23PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> With only 4 drives RAID6 doesn't make sense as RAID10 is superior in
> every way.
Except raid6 can lose any random 2 drives, while raid10 can't.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-15 12:33 Suboptimal raid6 linear read speed Peter Rabbitson
2013-01-15 12:45 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-15 12:56 ` Peter Rabbitson
2013-01-15 16:13 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-15 12:49 ` Phil Turmel
2013-01-15 12:55 ` Peter Rabbitson
2013-01-15 17:09 ` Charles Polisher
2013-01-15 19:57 ` keld
2013-01-16 4:43 ` Charles Polisher
2013-01-16 6:37 ` Tommy Apel Hansen
2013-01-16 9:36 ` keld
2013-01-16 16:09 ` Charles Polisher
2013-01-16 20:40 ` EJ Vincent
2013-01-15 23:17 ` Phil Turmel
2013-01-16 2:48 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-01-16 2:58 ` Peter Rabbitson [this message]
2013-01-16 20:29 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-01-16 21:20 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2013-01-17 15:51 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-18 8:31 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-01-18 9:18 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-18 22:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-01-19 7:43 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-19 22:48 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-01-19 23:51 ` Maarten
2013-01-20 0:16 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-20 0:49 ` Maarten
2013-01-20 1:37 ` Phil Turmel
2013-01-20 9:44 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-20 6:26 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-20 9:39 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-20 16:55 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-20 17:15 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-20 17:17 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-20 17:20 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-19 23:53 ` Phil Turmel
2013-01-20 9:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-20 19:28 ` Peter Grandi
2013-01-20 21:09 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-20 21:50 ` Peter Grandi
2013-01-21 5:24 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-01-21 14:40 ` Peter Rabbitson
2013-01-21 20:32 ` Peter Grandi
2013-01-21 20:55 ` Peter Grandi
2013-01-21 22:00 ` Peter Grandi
2013-01-19 13:21 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130116025857.GA31112@rabbit.us \
--to=rabbit+list@rabbit.us \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philip@turmel.org \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.