From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:54:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130116195416.c2d9a107.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130117024246.GF20928@kroah.com>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:42:46 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > FWIW, Andrew took my patch in mm:
> > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-rework-locking-to-fix-lock-ordering-on-takeover.patch
> > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-yet-another-band-aid-for-fixing-lockdep-mess.patch
>
>
> Ok, so, which one should I take for 3.8? And ideally the fb maintainer
> should do this, not I, right?
Please see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fbdev/msg08954.html
Tomi might be able to review the above for us. I think we need both.
If nothing else happens I intend to send both Linuswards for 3.8 in a
week or two.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:54:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130116195416.c2d9a107.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130117024246.GF20928@kroah.com>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:42:46 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > FWIW, Andrew took my patch in mm:
> > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-rework-locking-to-fix-lock-ordering-on-takeover.patch
> > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-yet-another-band-aid-for-fixing-lockdep-mess.patch
>
>
> Ok, so, which one should I take for 3.8? And ideally the fb maintainer
> should do this, not I, right?
Please see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fbdev/msg08954.html
Tomi might be able to review the above for us. I think we need both.
If nothing else happens I intend to send both Linuswards for 3.8 in a
week or two.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-05 12:13 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem Sedat Dilek
2013-01-05 12:13 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-15 14:25 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-01-15 14:25 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-01-15 14:47 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-01-15 14:47 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-01-15 16:46 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-01-15 16:46 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-01-16 9:21 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-16 9:21 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-16 9:35 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-01-16 9:35 ` Takashi Iwai
2013-01-16 9:52 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-16 9:52 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-16 9:59 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-16 9:59 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-16 11:07 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-16 12:51 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-16 12:51 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-17 2:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-17 2:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-17 3:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-01-17 3:54 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-17 4:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-17 4:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-05 11:08 Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130116195416.c2d9a107.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.