From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 04:16:33 +0000 Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem Message-Id: <20130117041633.GA21551@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <20130117024246.GF20928@kroah.com> <20130116195416.c2d9a107.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20130116195416.c2d9a107.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Morton Cc: Takashi Iwai , sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Jiri Kosina , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jiri Slaby On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:54:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:42:46 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > FWIW, Andrew took my patch in mm: > > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-rework-locking-to-fix-lock-ordering-on-takeover.patch > > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-yet-another-band-aid-for-fixing-lockdep-mess.patch > > > > > > Ok, so, which one should I take for 3.8? And ideally the fb maintainer > > should do this, not I, right? > > Please see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fbdev/msg08954.html > > Tomi might be able to review the above for us. I think we need both. > If nothing else happens I intend to send both Linuswards for 3.8 in a > week or two. Ok, that sounds fine with me, thanks for doing that. greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758803Ab3AQEPc (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:15:32 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:45443 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758393Ab3AQEPb (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:15:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:16:33 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Andrew Morton Cc: Takashi Iwai , sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Jiri Kosina , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem Message-ID: <20130117041633.GA21551@kroah.com> References: <20130117024246.GF20928@kroah.com> <20130116195416.c2d9a107.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130116195416.c2d9a107.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:54:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:42:46 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > FWIW, Andrew took my patch in mm: > > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-rework-locking-to-fix-lock-ordering-on-takeover.patch > > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-yet-another-band-aid-for-fixing-lockdep-mess.patch > > > > > > Ok, so, which one should I take for 3.8? And ideally the fb maintainer > > should do this, not I, right? > > Please see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fbdev/msg08954.html > > Tomi might be able to review the above for us. I think we need both. > If nothing else happens I intend to send both Linuswards for 3.8 in a > week or two. Ok, that sounds fine with me, thanks for doing that. greg k-h