All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Max Horn <max@quendi.de>, Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix some clang warnings
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:24:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130117102427.GC4574@serenity.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130116190137.GD2476@farnsworth.metanate.com>

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:01:37PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:24:49AM -0800, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:22:40PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks for checking. I'd rather squelch the warning completely (as in my
> > re-post of Max's patch from a few minutes ago), and we can loosen it
> > (possibly with a version check) later when a fix is widely disseminated.
> 
> I checked again with a trunk build of clang and the warning's still
> there, so I've created a clang bug [1] to see if they will change the
> behaviour.
> 
> [1] http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14968

Well, that was quick!  This warning is now gone when using a fresh trunk
build of clang.

>From [2], it looks like this will become version 3.3 (in about 5
months).  So should we change the condition to:

#if defined(__GNUC__) && (!defined(__clang__) ||
	__clang_major__ > 3 || \
        (__clang__major == 3 && __clang_minor__ >= 3)


[2] http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html


John

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-17 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-16 14:53 [PATCH] fix some clang warnings Max Horn
2013-01-16 16:04 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 16:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-16 17:12     ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 17:18       ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 17:26         ` Max Horn
2013-01-16 17:50           ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:00             ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:09               ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:12               ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 18:15                 ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 18:21                   ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 18:22                   ` John Keeping
2013-01-16 18:24                     ` Jeff King
2013-01-16 19:01                       ` John Keeping
2013-01-17 10:24                         ` John Keeping [this message]
2013-01-16 22:47                       ` [PATCH 1/2] fix clang -Wconstant-conversion with bit fields Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 22:47                         ` [PATCH 2/2] fix clang -Wtautological-compare with unsigned enum Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 23:10                           ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-17 10:32                           ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-17 11:00                             ` John Keeping
2013-01-17 11:23                               ` [PATCH] combine-diff: suppress a clang warning John Keeping
2013-01-17 16:44                               ` [PATCH 2/2] fix clang -Wtautological-compare with unsigned enum Linus Torvalds
2013-01-17 16:56                                 ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-17 17:02                                 ` John Keeping
2013-01-18 17:15                                 ` Phil Hord
2013-01-18 18:52                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-01-16 23:08                         ` [PATCH 1/2] fix clang -Wconstant-conversion with bit fields John Keeping
2013-01-16 23:09                           ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 23:15                             ` Antoine Pelisse
2013-01-16 23:43                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-16 23:46                           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-01-16 18:03             ` [PATCH] fix some clang warnings Tomas Carnecky
2013-01-16 18:12             ` Matthieu Moy
2013-02-01  5:37             ` Miles Bader

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130117102427.GC4574@serenity.lan \
    --to=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=apelisse@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=max@quendi.de \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.