Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 2/2] nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: Fix inclusion of elftosb and mxsldr

["Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>]

Hi,

please keep the ML in copy.

Le Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:12:08 -0200,
Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> a écrit :

> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> wrote:
> > Le Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:29:04 -0200,
> > Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> wrote:
> >> > Le Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:02:29 -0200,
> >> > Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> a écrit :
> >> >> > Shouldn't we limit this to the machines which need these tools ?
> >> >>
> >> >> How do you think we can manage this?
> >> >>
> >> > maybe using mxs override in the bbappend ?
> >>
> >> Or maybe armv5? since this is useful for toolchains for all mxs SoCs?
> >>
> > no, i.MX25 is armv5 and doesn't use these tools.
> > And other BSP can provide support for armv5 machines which also don't
> > need these tools.
> 
> So in this case use 'mxs' would do it. The problem with this is the
> package group is a native so it is suppose to be regarding host but we
> seems to be changing it content of the host depending on the target.
> 
What is the problem ?
The SDK are already typed with parameters of the target (headers of the
target's kernel, compiler's target arch, dev libraries included in sync
with the content of target's image, etc ...).

Eric