From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/76] ARC: Process-creation/scheduling/idle-loop Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:15 +0000 Message-ID: <201301181435.15491.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1358511930-7424-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1358511930-7424-18-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:59095 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753657Ab3AROf0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:35:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1358511930-7424-18-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Vineet Gupta Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Thomas Gleixner , Frederic Weisbecker On Friday 18 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote: > +void cpu_idle(void) > +{ > + /* Since we SLEEP in idle loop, TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can't be set */ > + > + /* endless idle loop with no priority at all */ > + while (1) { > + tick_nohz_idle_enter(); > + rcu_idle_enter(); > + > + while (!need_resched()) > + arch_idle(); > + > + rcu_idle_exit(); > + tick_nohz_idle_exit(); > + > + schedule_preempt_disabled(); > + } > +} Unless I'm mistaken, you have introduced the classic sleep race here, where an interrupt can happen between the check for need_resched() and the sleep instruction in arch_idle(). To avoid that, you need to disable interrupts around the inner loop. The sleep instruction should return with interrupts implicitly enabled if ARC behaves like most other architectures doing this. Arnd