From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CA8E002AB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:30:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r0LIULYq032411; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:30:22 -0600 Received: from DLEE74.ent.ti.com (dlee74.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.8]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0LIUL4Y001765; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:30:21 -0600 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by DLEE74.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:30:21 -0600 Received: from localhost ([158.218.102.158]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0LIULsf013852; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:30:21 -0600 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:30:20 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Jack Mitchell Message-ID: <20130121183020.GA15396@edge> References: <50FD1AC4.1050506@communistcode.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <50FD1AC4.1050506@communistcode.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: New KERNEL_CCSUFFIX X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:30:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:39:00AM +0000, Jack Mitchell wrote: > Morning all, > > With Khems recent 'kernel.bbclass, module-base.bbclass: Use CC to > form KERNEL_CC' patch, it seems the kernel compile in meta-ti is now > knackered. > > I get the error message: > > ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES > 'virtual/arm-oecore-linux-gnueabi-gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX}' > > Which I guess is related to line 120 in multi-kernel.inc - I have > tried to understand what the changes that Khem made are but it goes > a bit above my comprehension level unfortunately. So I was wondering > if anyone has a patch or any suggestions on how to get this going > again? Jack, Thanks. I'm already looking into multi-kernel.inc due to other issues, so I'll try to fix this one as well. No ETA though... :) -- Denys