From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI / PM: Make acpi_bus_init_power() more robust
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:10:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130122071056.GB2239@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24285515.9Jp3KUo9Px@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:09:01AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> The ACPI specification requires the _PSC method to be present under
> a device object if its power state cannot be inferred from the states
> of power resources used by it (ACPI 5, Section 7.6.2). However, it
> also requires that (for power states D0-D2 and D3hot) if the _PSn
> (n = 0, 1, 2, 3) method is present under the device object, it also
> must be executed after the power resources have been set
> appropriately for the device to go into power state Dn (D3 means
> D3hot in this case). Thus it is not clear from the specification
> whether or not the _PSn method should be executed if the initial
> configuraion of power resources used by the device indicates power
> state Dn and the _PSC method is not present.
>
> The current implementation of acpi_bus_init_power() is based on the
> assumption that it should not be necessary to execute _PSn in the
> above situation, but experience shows that in fact that assumption
> need not be satisfied. For this reason, make acpi_bus_init_power()
> always execute _PSn if the initial configuration of device power
> resources indicates power state Dn.
>
> Reported-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
You can add also,
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
if you like. Thanks for fixing this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 2:05 [PATCH 0/4] ACPI / PM: Initial power state checking and power state setting changes Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 2:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI / PM: Make acpi_bus_init_power() more robust Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 7:10 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-01-22 2:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI / PM: Introduce helper for executing _PSn methods Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 2:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / PM: Always evaluate _PSn after setting power resources Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 2:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / PM: Sanitize checks in acpi_power_on_resources() Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130122071056.GB2239@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.