From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:54:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:35672 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6825653Ab3AVLyracLpZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:54:47 +0100 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0MBsiBu031340; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:54:44 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r0MBshFc031333; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:54:43 +0100 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:54:43 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: John Stultz Cc: Yong Zhang , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Any NXP PNX user left (was: Re: pnx_clocksource broken?) Message-ID: <20130122115443.GB14944@linux-mips.org> References: <4F84E531.3010001@linaro.org> <20120416140040.GA2378@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120416140040.GA2378@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-archive-position: 35504 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:00:40PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > Looking at arch/mips/pnx8550/common/time.c the pnx_clocksource never > > seems to be assigned a mult/shift value before it calls > > clocksource_register(). Clearly this is broken and I suspect this > > clocksource is never used. > > > > I was hoping to convert this driver over (its the last of 3 > > remaining) to use clocksource_register_hz/khz() but I'm not sure > > what the actual frequency of the hardware should be. Is > > mips_hpt_frequency the right value here? > > > > Even so, if this is clocksource is never used, should it just be removed? > > Iow PNX has not had a functioning clocksource for a very long time. Equally > there has not been any user feedback for ages and I wonder if that makes the > PNX code a candidate for removal. > > Any remaining PNX users should raise their voice now or PNX will be > toast. Soon. Not soon at all but nobody's answered so I've removed all of PNX8550. Ralf