From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752785Ab3AVND1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:03:27 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:52259 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752132Ab3AVND0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:03:26 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/33] net: Convert to devm_ioremap_resource() Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:03:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.7.0-7-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, w.sang@pengutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <1358762966-20791-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@avionic-design.de> <20130121.152913.1377695352860141642.davem@davemloft.net> <20130122065629.GA14523@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> In-Reply-To: <20130122065629.GA14523@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201301221303.06785.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:PwJuxv6YSE02pPLuXZW0rx0C86jUqN85KqSxHvbKAxP 7mjytG418PPs8xG48S45BzEKbbWUVgn8+yswW8qHzmJvWM5FHi BDOc+fGCu1GVk5utBfMB3kxCC2+8QDNf8L7N5TCjbpCuiscxq6 rqEQUW11OMnqCY/BzniitfoWSshcsn/xB0ks5l1L4Y2MFiqT1m 7a2p1QhwpLAc89+xlaf/PIbkmBphfFqES7m9RCmuejK287x8ul 9yoWOqfusQ937xlgoj8ziRaOQ/yzOV9K6CXx3nFc+bLfgq92qg H3D5EAUR5pD6u8gCCH7A/qKH72oKwD6t0tUkYMv1LHx5CdxQ/c oVAGr2zbwE3fCwig8Mqs= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 22 January 2013, Thierry Reding wrote: > I planned to do so initially, but that yielded a Cc list of 156 people > and mailing lists, which I thought wasn't going to go down so well > either. In general I like Cc'ing everyone concerned on all patches of > the series, specifically for reasons of context. Some people have been > annoyed when I did so. Still, for small series where only a few dozen > people are concerned that seems to me to be the best way. But 156 email > addresses is a different story. > > Either you add to many people or you don't add enough. Where do we draw > the line? I've had the same problem a couple of times. The best compromise seems to be to Cc only the top-level subsystem maintainers and mailing lists on the first email. Arnd