All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tun mq failure
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:18:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130123131810.GA18276@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FFD33B.2090103@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:10:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/23/2013 07:41 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:06:40PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:05:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> This is when trying to start a VPN using some old openvpn binary so MQ
> >>> is not set.
> >>>
> >>> So
> >>> 1. I think we should limit allocation of MQ to when MQ flag is set in SETIFF.
> >>> 2. order 7 allocation is 2^^7 pages - about half a megabyte of contigious
> >>>    memory. This is quite likely to fail.
> >>>    Let's start with a small limit on number of queues, like 8?
> >>>    Then we know it will succeed.
> >>>    Longer term we might want to solve it differently.
> >> This has been come up before:
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/255647/focus=255902
> >>
> >> I think a solution to this problem is still outstanding.
> > Right. What (at least I) missed is that it's the
> > queue array allocation that fails here.
> > So I think something like the following will sort the first issue
> > (compiled only):
> >
> > For the second, for 3.8 maybe the prudent thing to do is
> > to set MAX_TAP_QUEUES to a small value, like 8, to avoid
> > userspace relying on a large number of queues being available,
> > and look at a better way to do this longer term, like
> > using an array of pointers.
> 
> Sure, this is just the method I reply in that thread. Not sure 8 is the
> best, but since it fit into one page, should be ok. Maybe we can use
> flex array to avoid high order memory allocation in the longer term.

Right so let's for now use  DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES as Eric suggested.

> >
> > --->
> >
> > tun: don't waste memory on unused queues
> >
> > If MQ flag is off, we never attach more than 1 queue.
> > So let's not allocate memory for the unused ones.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > index af372d0..813d303 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > @@ -1577,6 +1577,7 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
> >  	else {
> >  		char *name;
> >  		unsigned long flags = 0;
> > +		unsigned int max_tap_queues;
> >  
> >  		if (!ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> >  			return -EPERM;
> > @@ -1599,9 +1600,13 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
> >  		if (*ifr->ifr_name)
> >  			name = ifr->ifr_name;
> >  
> > +		if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_MULTI_QUEUE)
> > +			max_tap_queues = MAX_TAP_QUEUES;
> > +		else
> > +			max_tap_queues = 1;
> >  		dev = alloc_netdev_mqs(sizeof(struct tun_struct), name,
> >  				       tun_setup,
> > -				       MAX_TAP_QUEUES, MAX_TAP_QUEUES);
> > +				       max_tap_queues, max_tap_queues);
> >  		if (!dev)
> >  			return -ENOMEM;
> >  

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-23 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-23 10:05 tun mq failure Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-23 11:06 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-01-23 11:41   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-23 12:10     ` Jason Wang
2013-01-23 13:18       ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-01-23 12:08   ` Jason Wang
2013-01-23 13:18     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-23 13:20       ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130123131810.GA18276@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.