From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] irq_work changes for 3.9
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:51:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130124115123.GC32574@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358345841-29136-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> The printk changes for full dynticks support are still pending while
> we don't know Linus's opinion about these. Meanwhile here is the
> part of it that I think is uncontroversial. This way we can make
> the next submission attempt to Linus a bit more simple.
>
> These three patches are general fixes for irq work. The two first
> patches fix tight races on global irq work claiming that prevent the irq work
> subsystem from dropping a work enqueuing attempt because it thinks it's
> already pending while it may be already executing or executed.
>
> The last patch just extends irq work support everywhere. It's also a
> kconfig cleanup.
>
> The branch can be found at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> core/irq_work
>
> Head is: 6147a9d8070e1c9d16d57eb53a14942b95b28dc4
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---
> Frederic Weisbecker (3):
> irq_work: Fix racy IRQ_WORK_BUSY flag setting
> irq_work: Fix racy check on work pending flag
> irq_work: Remove CONFIG_HAVE_IRQ_WORK
>
> arch/alpha/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/blackfin/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/frv/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/hexagon/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/mips/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/parisc/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/sh/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
> drivers/staging/iio/trigger/Kconfig | 1 -
> init/Kconfig | 4 ----
> kernel/irq_work.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 16 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Pulled into tip:irq/core, thanks Frederic!
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-16 14:17 [GIT PULL] irq_work changes for 3.9 Frederic Weisbecker
2013-01-16 22:04 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-01-16 22:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-01-16 22:48 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-01-24 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130124115123.GC32574@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.