From: Leandro Lucarella <leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Doubts about listen backlog and tcp_max_syn_backlog
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:22:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130124122223.GQ4608@sociomantic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510039C8.7040401@hp.com>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:28:08AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> >Then if syncookies are enabled, the time spent in connect() shouldn't be
> >bigger than 3 seconds even if SYNs are being "dropped" by listen, right?
>
> Do you mean if "ESTABLISHED" connections are dropped because the
> listen queue is full? I don't think I would put that as "SYNs being
> dropped by listen" - too easy to confuse that with an actual
> dropping of a SYN segment.
I was just kind of quoting the name given by netstat: "SYNs to LISTEN
sockets dropped" (for kernel 3.0, I noticed newer kernels don't have
this stat anymore, or the name was changed). I still don't know if we
are talking about the same thing.
> But yes, I would not expect a connect() call to remain incomplete
> for any longer than it took to receive an SYN|ACK from the other
> end.
So the only reason to experience these high times spent in connect()
should be because a SYN or SYN|ACK was actually loss in a lower layer,
like an error in the network device or a transmission error?
> That would be 3 (,9, 21, etc...) seconds on a kernel with 3
> seconds as the initial retransmission timeout.
Which can't be changed without recompiling, right?
Thanks!
--
Leandro Lucarella
sociomantic labs GmbH
http://www.sociomantic.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 16:10 Doubts about listen backlog and tcp_max_syn_backlog Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-22 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-22 16:59 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-22 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-22 18:17 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-22 18:42 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-22 22:01 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-23 10:47 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-23 19:28 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-24 12:22 ` Leandro Lucarella [this message]
2013-01-24 18:44 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-24 19:21 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-25 6:12 ` Nivedita SInghvi
2013-01-25 10:05 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-28 2:48 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2013-01-28 5:21 ` Vijay Subramanian
2013-01-28 14:40 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-28 13:08 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-28 2:49 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2013-01-23 20:48 ` Vijay Subramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130124122223.GQ4608@sociomantic.com \
--to=leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.