From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Fix print format for u64
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:06:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125080656.GB25314@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM31RKPZeNhUx5OCzE2+Rr=5qSL72=tgRpacZwFos9p-cajAg@mail.gmail.com>
* Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I suppose - is this patch warning-free both on 64-bit and 32-bit
> >> > systems?
> >>
> >> Yes, just confirmed that this patch is warning-free on both 64-bit and
> >> 32-bit machines.
> >
> > Apparently it's not all good, see the warning attached below.
>
> Yeah this patch is broken; this is not properly fixable as is without
> #ifdefs (or fixing the insanity that is atomic64_read).
>
> Specifically:
>
> On some architectures (e.g. x86_64) atomic64_read is typed long
> On some others (e.g. x86-32) it's typed long long
> On yet others (e.g. arm) it's typed u64
Hm, cannot we type atomic64_read() to u64 on x86-64 as well, and
fix other architectures? How widespread is this problem, have
you checked that perhaps?
I'm all for clean, consistent types instead of #ifdef or
temporary variable uglies.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-25 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-25 11:24 [PATCH v2] sched: Fix print format for u64 Fabio Estevam
2013-01-11 1:30 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-01-24 14:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-24 14:47 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-01-25 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-25 7:31 ` Paul Turner
2013-01-25 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-01-25 16:06 ` Paul Turner
2013-01-24 20:22 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Fabio Estevam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130125080656.GB25314@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.