From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic dynamic per cpu refcounting
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:29:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125182924.GA17514@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130125180941.GA16896@redhat.com>
On 01/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > +void __percpu_ref_get(struct percpu_ref *ref, bool alloc)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long pcpu_count;
> > + uint64_t v;
> > +
> > + pcpu_count = ACCESS_ONCE(ref->pcpu_count);
> > +
> > + if (REF_STATUS(pcpu_count) == PCPU_REF_PTR) {
> > + /* for rcu - we're not using rcu_dereference() */
> > + smp_read_barrier_depends();
> > + __this_cpu_inc(*((unsigned __percpu *) pcpu_count));
>
> The comment looks confusing a bit... smp_read_barrier_depends() is not
> for rcu, we obviously need it to access (unsigned __percpu *) pcpu_count.
> But yes, since we didn't use rcu_dereference() we have to add it by hand.
Hmm. Otoh, arch/alpha uses asm-generic/percpu.h so in theory we need
smp_read_barrier_depends() after __this_cpu_generic_to_op() calculates the
"real" pointer, __this_cpu_ptr() ?
Just curious...
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-25 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130124232024.GA584@google.com>
2013-01-25 18:09 ` [PATCH] generic dynamic per cpu refcounting Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-25 18:29 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-01-28 18:10 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-28 18:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-25 19:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-28 18:15 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-28 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-28 18:49 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-28 18:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-28 20:22 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-28 20:27 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-28 20:55 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-28 21:18 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-28 21:24 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-28 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-28 21:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-28 21:48 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-28 21:45 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-28 21:50 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-29 16:39 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-29 19:29 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-29 19:51 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-29 20:02 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-29 21:45 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-01-29 22:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-29 18:04 ` [PATCH] module: Convert to generic percpu refcounts Kent Overstreet
2013-01-28 18:07 ` [PATCH] generic dynamic per cpu refcounting Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130125182924.GA17514@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=koverstreet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.