All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] TTY: Add TTY slave enumeration support
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:41:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125214121.GA30924@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12848b50e1096dc11a193694ee248d51d45ce093.1359022955.git.lv.zheng@intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:30:21PM +0800, Lv Zheng wrote:
> In the recent ACPI 5.0 specification updates, firmwares are provided the
> possibilities to enumerate the UART slave devices known to the platform
> vendors.
> There are the needs in Linux to utilize the benefits:
> 1. hotplug uevent
> 2. serial configuration
> Currently, only serial cards on the specific bus (ex. PCMCIA) can be
> enumerated and userspace can obtain the hotplug event of the UART target
> devices. Linux kernel is lack of an overall enumeration mechanism for
> UART slave devices.

Huh?  That's flat out not true, otherwise how would userspace be
creating the proper /dev/tty* nodes for all tty devices?

> In order to send uevent, a device need to be a class device or a bus
> device. This patch introduces a tty_enum bus since the enumerated slave
> devices are expected to be physical devices.

Again, tty devices are already class devices, and they send out uevents.
You can see this today by watching the uevent stream using a tool like
'udevadmin monitor'.

> When the UART slave devices are created, userspace uevent rules can
> pass the creation details to the userspace driver managers
> (ex. hciattach), then the device managers can read hardware IDs and the
> serial configurations from the exported device attributes to match and
> configure a userspace TTY device driver.

What?  We do that today, no kernel changes needed.

> The created slave devices will be automatically unregistered when the
> associated TTY ports are destructed.

Again, this happens today.

Or am I missing something big and major here?  How have people been
seeing and configuring their tty devices for the last 8+ years or so
since the 2.6.0 kernel was released with uevent support for tty devices?

lost,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-25 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-03  3:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] ACPI/UART: Add ACPI 5.0 enueration support for UART Lv Zheng
2012-12-03  3:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] UART: Add UART subsystem as a bus Lv Zheng
2012-12-03 11:46   ` Alan Cox
2012-12-05  3:37     ` Zheng, Lv
2012-12-04 18:54   ` Mika Westerberg
2012-12-04 19:50     ` Alan Cox
2012-12-05  6:20       ` Mika Westerberg
2012-12-05  7:07         ` Zheng, Lv
2012-12-05  7:42           ` Mika Westerberg
2012-12-05  9:43         ` Alan Cox
2012-12-06  1:26           ` Zheng, Lv
2012-12-06  1:55             ` Zheng, Lv
2012-12-06 13:53             ` Alan Cox
2012-12-07  4:54               ` Zheng, Lv
2012-12-07  5:41                 ` Zheng, Lv
2012-12-07  7:24                   ` Huang Ying
2012-12-07 10:27                   ` Alan Cox
2012-12-07 10:25                 ` Alan Cox
2012-12-06  7:36           ` Zheng, Lv
2012-12-06  7:52             ` Mika Westerberg
2012-12-05  3:49     ` Zheng, Lv
2012-12-03  3:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] ACPI / UART: Add ACPI enumeration support for UART bus Lv Zheng
2012-12-03  3:40 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] UART: Add dummy devices to test the enumeration Lv Zheng
2012-12-05  3:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI/UART: Add ACPI 5.0 enueration support for UART Lv Zheng
2012-12-05  3:51   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] UART: Add UART subsystem as a bus Lv Zheng
2012-12-05  3:51   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ACPI / UART: Add ACPI enumeration support for UART bus Lv Zheng
2012-12-05  3:51   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] UART / 8250: Add declearation of serial8250 driver Lv Zheng
2012-12-05  3:52   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] UART: Add dummy devices to test the enumeration Lv Zheng
2012-12-06  9:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] ACPI/UART: Add ACPI 5.0 enueration support for UART Lv Zheng
2012-12-06  9:21   ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] UART: Add UART subsystem as a bus Lv Zheng
2012-12-06 13:40     ` Alan Cox
2012-12-07  3:52       ` Zheng, Lv
2012-12-07 10:22         ` Alan Cox
2012-12-06  9:22   ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] ACPI / UART: Add ACPI enumeration support for UART bus Lv Zheng
2012-12-06  9:22   ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] UART / 8250: Add declearation of serial8250 driver Lv Zheng
2012-12-06  9:22   ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] UART: Add dummy devices to test the enumeration Lv Zheng
2013-01-09  9:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI/UART: Add ACPI 5.0 enueration support for UART Lv Zheng
2013-01-09  9:17   ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] TTY: Add TTY slave enumeration support Lv Zheng
2013-01-09  9:17   ` Lv Zheng
2013-01-09  9:18   ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] ACPI / UART: Add ACPI enumeration support for UART Lv Zheng
2013-01-09  9:18   ` Lv Zheng
2013-01-09  9:18   ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] UART: Add dummy devices to test the enumeration Lv Zheng
2013-01-09  9:18   ` Lv Zheng
2013-01-09  9:17 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI/UART: Add ACPI 5.0 enueration support for UART Lv Zheng
2013-01-24 10:30 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] ACPI/UART: Add ACPI 5.0 enumeration " Lv Zheng
2013-01-24 10:30   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] TTY: Add TTY slave enumeration support Lv Zheng
2013-01-25 21:41     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2013-01-26  0:32       ` Alan Cox
2013-01-26  0:21         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-26  3:04       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-01-26  3:42         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-28  2:58           ` Zheng, Lv
2013-01-30  4:46             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-25 21:45     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-26  3:12       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-01-26  3:44         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-28  3:02           ` Zheng, Lv
2013-01-24 10:30   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ACPI / UART: Add ACPI enumeration support for UART Lv Zheng
2013-01-24 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH v5] HACK: UART: Add dummy devices to test the enumeration Lv Zheng
2013-02-06  6:26 ` [RFC PATCH] ACPI / serial: Add UART change_pm support with ACPI power domain Lv Zheng
2013-02-06 19:07   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-02-06 21:39     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-06 21:38       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-02-07  0:38         ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-03  2:05 ` [PATCH v6] ACPI / serial: Add peripheral PnP IDs enumeration support Lv Zheng
2013-04-03 16:14   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-04-04 10:12     ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-07  3:05       ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-04 15:43     ` Zheng, Lv
2013-04-04 18:23       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-04-07  3:11         ` Zheng, Lv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130125214121.GA30924@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.