From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:46824 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750990Ab3A0Pjb (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:39:31 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:39:25 -0700 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: asking for an example job file Message-ID: <20130127153925.GO15635@kernel.dk> References: <50F3CB5F.8070507@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: fio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: fio@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Sullivan Cc: fio On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Greg Sullivan wrote: > (resending in plain text - sigh) > > I tried to use the "rate" functionality on Windows some time ago, and > it was extremely erratic. As I recall, the Windows maintainer couldn't > reproduce the behaviour I was observing, and since the work I was > doing was not critical, I gave up. (yes - I know - boo hiss! :) :) It might have something to do with some of the timing functions on Windows, which are way too coarse to be used for rate limiting. If you have the job file that you used handy, I can try and take a look at it. -- Jens Axboe