From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754939Ab3A0Sso (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:48:44 -0500 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:46080 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754755Ab3A0Ssc (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:48:32 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:48:30 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: fangxiaozhi 00110321 Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zihan@huawei.com, Lin.Lei@huawei.com, greg@kroah.com, neil.yi@huawei.com, wangyuhua@huawei.com, huqiao36@huawei.com, balbi@ti.com, mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net, sebastian@breakpoint.cc Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]linux-usb:optimize to match the Huawei USB storage devices and support new switch command Message-ID: <20130127184830.GB7163@breakpoint.cc> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:46:13AM +0800, fangxiaozhi 00110321 wrote: > diff -uprN linux-3.8-rc4_orig/drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c linux-3.8-rc4/drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c > --- linux-3.8-rc4_orig/drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c 2013-01-22 14:12:42.594238726 +0800 > +++ linux-3.8-rc4/drivers/usb/storage/initializers.c 2013-01-22 14:28:21.512294889 +0800 > @@ -104,3 +104,75 @@ int usb_stor_huawei_e220_init(struct us_ > US_DEBUGP("Huawei mode set result is %d\n", result); > return 0; > } > + > +/* > + * It will send a scsi switch command called rewind' to huawei dongle. > + * When the dongle receives this command at the first time, > + * it will reboot immediately. After rebooted, it will ignore this command. > + * So it is unnecessary to read its response. > + */ > +static int usb_stor_huawei_scsi_init(struct us_data *us) > +{ > + int result = 0; > + int act_len = 0; > + struct bulk_cb_wrap *bcbw = (struct bulk_cb_wrap *) us->iobuf; > + char rewind_cmd[] = {0x11, 0x06, 0x20, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x01, 0x00, > + 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00}; > + > + bcbw->Signature = cpu_to_le32(US_BULK_CB_SIGN); > + bcbw->Tag = 0; > + bcbw->DataTransferLength = 0; > + bcbw->Flags = bcbw->Lun = 0; > + bcbw->Length = sizeof(rewind_cmd); > + memset(bcbw->CDB, 0, sizeof(bcbw->CDB)); First you memset() 16 bytes of CDB to 0 > + memcpy(bcbw->CDB, rewind_cmd, sizeof(rewind_cmd)); And now you copy 16 bytes from rewind_cmd to CDB. So the memset is not really required, is it? > + > + result = usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf(us, us->send_bulk_pipe, bcbw, > + US_BULK_CB_WRAP_LEN, &act_len); > + US_DEBUGP("transfer actual length=%d, result=%d\n", act_len, result); > + return result; > +} Sebastian