Re: [PATCH] l10n: de.po: translate 11 new messages

[Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:33:09AM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote:
> Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >  #: builtin/reset.c:275
> > -#, fuzzy, c-format
> > +#, c-format
> >  msgid "Failed to resolve '%s' as a valid revision."
> > -msgstr "Konnte '%s' nicht als gültige Referenz auflösen."
> > +msgstr "Konnte '%s' nicht als gültige Revision auflösen."
> 
> You don't have "revision" in the glossary[1] yet.  Wouldn't it be
> appropriate to treat it as "commit", and translate as "Version" to avoid
> introducing yet another term?
> 
> Or am I missing some subtle distinction between commit and revision?
> 

I don't think there's a distinction. Since we've already translated
"revision" as "Revision" in a couple of other messages, I'll make a
new "s/Revision/Version" commit on top.

> Since it's only a single nit, feel free to add my ack when you reroll:
> 
> Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/ralfth/git-po-de/wiki/Glossary
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Rast
> trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch