From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Error state should print /sys/kernel/debug Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:05:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20130129170527.GS9135@intel.com> References: <1359415936-2732-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> <20130129084112.GG6187@dyon.amr.corp.intel.com> <20130129085418.GF14766@phenom.ffwll.local> <20130129085236.00001740@unknown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C8DE68AD for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:05:30 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130129085236.00001740@unknown> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:52:36AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:54:18 +0100 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > = > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:41:12AM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:32:15PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > /sys/kernel/debug has more or less been the standard location of > > > > debugfs for several years now. Other parts of DRM already use > > > > this location, so we should as well. > > > > = > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky > > > = > > > Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau > > = > > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. Oh and fixed up a bikeshed > > from checkpatch.pl while applying: > > = > > Applying: drm/i915: Error state should print /sys/kernel/debug > > WARNING: line over 80 characters > > #22: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:1308: > > + DRM_INFO("capturing error event; look for more information > > in /sys/kernel/debug/dri/%d/i915_error_state\n", > > = > > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 8 lines checked > > = > > Yeah, I've added that OCD thing to my patch apply pipeline, let's see > > how much fun it is ;-) > = > I've not looked at the final patch yet, but I think breaking up > constant strings is considered bad form, and lines above 80 are > generally favored for grepability. > = > At least James Bottomley said that in his talk and LPC, and a bunch of > other maintainers seemed to agree. (and I agree) I routinely ignore the 80 cols warnings. I'm sure a significant part of my patches violate it, even the ones w/o long strings. -- = Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 Intel OTC